All fact checks

“Electric cars always cost more to maintain than combustion cars”

Reviewed 2026-10-05 · 3 min read · 5 original sources

What the evidence shows

AAA's 2024 US new-car comparison found its electric category had the lowest maintenance, repair and tire costs. That does not mean every EV repair is cheap, or that lower servicing costs guarantee lower total ownership costs.

THE VEHICLES BEHIND THE NUMBERS

Older vehicles or current generations?

The studies do not make a direct older-versus-modern comparison. AAA models selected 2024 new-car categories, Ford supplies a 2024 Mach-E service schedule, and Mitchell's 2026 collision-claim figures pool all model years. NREL's cited maintenance input is a model assumption based on earlier research, not a 2024 fleet observation. None of these sources stratifies repair cost by battery chemistry or pack size.

We separate vehicles from before 2023 and 2023 onward. A report’s publication date does not establish a vehicle’s model year or a battery’s manufacturing date.

Before 2023

No separate result for this group is established by the cited evidence.

2023 and newer

2023 and newer2024 Mustang Mach-E service exampleSample & battery details
Vehicles / sample
Ford Mustang Mach-E; the online scheduled-maintenance example does not identify trim, drive layout, or battery variant.
Vehicle years
Model year 2024 (Ford owner's manual).
Battery chemistry
Not stated in the cited U.S. manual or technical-spec sheet.
Battery capacity
Ford's 2024 U.S. specification lists 72 kWh usable for Standard Range and 91 kWh usable for Extended Range; the service schedule does not identify which configuration.
Battery manufacture
Not reported.
Observation period
Manufacturer service schedule for MY2024; manual accessed 2026-10-05.
Vehicle years not establishedAAA and NREL maintenance-cost estimatesSample & battery details
Vehicles / sample
AAA reports category averages for selected top-selling 2024 models, without listing individual EVs. NREL supplies modeled BEV and combustion maintenance/repair inputs, not an identified fleet sample.
Vehicle years
AAA identifies top-selling 2024 models, but not each version. NREL's model input is based on earlier research and has no published vehicle model-year roster; publication years are not MYs.
Battery chemistry
Not reported; cost estimates are not chemistry-stratified.
Battery capacity
Not reported.
Battery manufacture
Not reported.
Observation period
Five-year / 75,000-mile modeled service, wear-repair, warranty, and tire costs; published September 2024.
Mixed vehicle generationsU.S. repairable-collision claimsSample & battery details
Vehicles / sample
BEV and ICE repairable-collision claims; individual makes, models, versions, and claim vehicle ages are not identified in the public summary.
Vehicle years
All model years pooled; no model-year split is published.
Battery chemistry
Not reported; collision costs are not chemistry-stratified.
Battery capacity
Not reported.
Battery manufacture
Not reported.
Observation period
United States, Q2 2026 repairable-collision claims.

“Not reported” means the source does not disclose it. Model year, first registration, vehicle assembly and battery manufacture are different dates. Unmatched studies cannot establish how much newer batteries improved.

MANUFACTURERS IN THIS EVIDENCE

Which brands do these results describe?

AAA and NREL report category estimates without naming their EV models. Ford’s manual provides one named Mustang Mach-E service schedule, but no comparative cost. Evidence is mixed-fleet plus one service example, not a Ford-versus-brand maintenance result.

EV-focused brands

No separately identified result for this group in the cited evidence.

Established multi-powertrain brands

FordView models & evidence scope (1 brands)
Ford

Named schedule example: 2024 Mustang Mach-E; manual specifies maintenance intervals, not comparative service cost.

All manufacturers are OEMs. These groups describe brand focus, not a quality ranking or country of origin. EV-focused brands can also sell plug-in hybrids. Results apply to the identified models, batteries and conditions.

Manufacturer and model sources (2)

What the comparative evidence shows

The absolute claim is contradicted by a substantial US comparison. AAA's 2024 study ranked the electric category lowest for maintenance, repair and tire expenses. Its estimates cover five years and 120,700.8 km and include scheduled service, wear repairs, a comprehensive extended warranty and one replacement set of tires. The same fact sheet ranked EVs highest for depreciation, demonstrating how a vehicle can be inexpensive to service while remaining costly to own overall. [1]

Lower service needs still leave real maintenance

A useful check is the manufacturer's schedule. Ford's model-year 2024 Mustang Mach-E manual specifies tire rotation and inspections at intervals no longer than a year or 16,093.4 km. Its listed work includes brakes, cooling, steering and suspension; brake fluid is changed every three years and the cabin filter every 32,186.9 km. An EV therefore remains a machine with wear items and safety-critical service needs. The schedule also helps distinguish required work from a dealer's optional package. [3]

NREL's 2024 transportation baseline provides a separate perspective: its starting maintenance and repair inputs are six cents per mile for battery electric vehicles and ten cents for combustion vehicles, with costs increasing by age under the model. These inputs come from earlier research. They are useful for understanding how cost projections are constructed, but should not be described as a new observation of all vehicles during 2024. [2]

Why some owners still receive large bills

A maintenance average is neither a maximum repair bill nor a warranty. A particular owner can face a costly fault even when average servicing is favorable. The relevant comparison must account for the same vehicle age, mileage, warranty coverage and repair category. One bill for a failed component cannot establish that all electric cars cost more, just as one trouble-free EV cannot establish that expensive faults never happen.

Collision repair is a separate cost category from scheduled service. Mitchell's Q2 2026 U.S. data put average repairable-claim severity at $5,684 for BEVs and $4,955 for ICE vehicles, a $729 difference and the narrowest gap Mitchell had recorded. That is an average for repairable collision claims across model years, not a routine-service bill or a prediction of an individual owner's premium. [4]

Keep routine maintenance, mechanical repair, collision repair, insurance, depreciation and financing visible as separate entries. Combining them into an undefined 'maintenance' figure changes the question being answered. Before buying, obtain the model's schedule and local service prices, check its warranty and available repair shops, and compare tire costs with a combustion vehicle of similar size and performance. The evidence supports lower average maintenance under specified assumptions; it leaves room for substantial differences between individual models and owners.

Data period: AAA 2024 estimates over five years and 75,000 miles; 2024 NREL modeling assumptions; service requirements for model-year 2024 Mustang Mach-E; Mitchell U.S. repairable collision claims during Q2 2026, across all model years

What this does—and doesn’t—tell us

  • AAA compares selected new-vehicle categories; it does not measure every old EV or every out-of-warranty battery repair.
  • NREL's assumptions draw on Burnham et al. 2021; publication in a 2024 model does not make the underlying evidence a 2024 observation.
  • Ford's online manual can be updated; the original manual supplied with a particular vehicle takes precedence. Its schedule is one model's example, not an industry-wide schedule.
  • Mitchell's severity figures describe repairable collision claims in the U.S. during Q2 2026 across all model years; they are not maintenance costs, insurance premiums, all repair events or individual bills.
WHAT TO TAKE AWAY

EV servicing is often cheaper, but it is not free. Compare maintenance and mechanical repairs directly, then assess insurance and depreciation separately when judging total ownership cost.

Keep the conversation curious.

Questions and corrections are welcome. Link your sources, challenge ideas, and be kind to people.

Discussion actions are unavailable until sign-in is configured.

You can still read published comments and their sources.

Loading discussion…

Found something that needs checking?

Identify the statement, explain your concern, and share original sources for our review.